Title: New Hampshire Legislature Debates 50/50 Parental Rights and Family Court Powers New Hampshire Legislature Debates 50/50 Parental Rights and Family Court Powers
Significant changes may be on the horizon for family law in New Hampshire. The House Children and Family Law Committee recently heard testimony on two controversial bills that could fundamentally alter how divorce, custody, and criminal matters are handled within the state’s court system.
At the heart of the debate is the balance between the constitutional rights of parents and the safety and “best interests” of the child.
House Bill 1770-FN: The Push for 50/50 Parenting
The most discussed piece of legislation, House Bill 1770-FN, sponsored by Rep. Matt Sabourin dit Choinière (R-Seabrook), seeks to establish a legal presumption that parents are entitled to equal parenting time.
Under current New Hampshire law, judges determine custody based on the discretionary “best interest of the child” standard. This bill would replace that with a standard where 50/50 custody is the default unless a parent is proven unfit by “clear and convincing evidence of harm.”
Arguments in Favor:
Supporters of the bill, including court watchdog Dana Albrecht, argue that the current system causes unnecessary pain in contentious divorces. Proponents believe the bill aligns with constitutional principles, asserting that the state should not require parents to prove their fitness to raise their own children.
Supporters of the bill, including court watchdog Dana Albrecht, argue that the current system causes unnecessary pain in contentious divorces. Proponents believe the bill aligns with constitutional principles, asserting that the state should not require parents to prove their fitness to raise their own children.
Concerns Raised:
Opponents, including representatives from New Hampshire Legal Assistance and Waypoint, expressed deep concerns regarding child welfare, particularly in cases involving domestic violence.
Opponents, including representatives from New Hampshire Legal Assistance and Waypoint, expressed deep concerns regarding child welfare, particularly in cases involving domestic violence.
Mary Krueger of NH Legal Assistance warned that a mandatory 50/50 split could force victims of domestic abuse to stay in dangerous relationships to protect their children from being left alone with an abuser. Emily Lawrence of Waypoint added that removing judicial flexibility and the “best interest” standard could weaken the law’s ability to protect vulnerable children.
House Bill 1687-FN: Limiting Family Court Jurisdiction
The committee also heard testimony regarding House Bill 1687-FN, sponsored by Rep. David Love (R-Derry). This bill aims to restrict the Family Division from adjudicating criminal matters, arguing that crimes such as assault should be handled exclusively in criminal court.
Rep. Love argued that when criminal behavior, such as domestic assault, is brought up in divorce or custody proceedings, it often “gets buried in family court.” He emphasized that if the state is serious about stopping domestic violence, these allegations must be treated as crimes in the appropriate venue.
During the hearing, questions were raised about the procedural realities of the court system. Rep. Albert “Buzz” Scherr noted that Family Court judges are Circuit Court judges and that only prosecutors can bring criminal charges, highlighting the complex intersection between family law and criminal procedure.
The Changing Landscape of Family Law
These bills highlight a growing tension in the legal system between ensuring parental equality and maintaining safeguards for child welfare. Whether these bills pass or undergo significant amendment, they represent a push for clearer boundaries in how the state handles domestic violence and divorce.
For parents currently navigating the court system, these discussions underscore the importance of having legal representation that understands both the current “best interest” standards and the constitutional rights of parents.
Expert Legal Guidance for NH Families
Family law is evolving, and the outcome of your case often depends on a deep understanding of the statutes and judicial discretion. Whether you are facing a custody battle, a divorce, or complex issues involving domestic violence, you need an advocate who can protect your rights and your children.
For expert legal insights on family law and parental rights in New Hampshire, visit cpt.law.
Next Steps
Understanding this aspect of California law is just one piece of comprehensive estate planning. Every family’s situation is unique, and California’s laws provide various tools to protect your assets and loved ones.
Whether you’re creating your first estate plan or updating an existing one, working with an experienced California estate planning attorney ensures your documents comply with current law and accomplish your goals.
Need Expert Estate Planning Guidance?
California estate planning law is complex and constantly evolving. Don’t navigate it alone.
California Probate and Trust, PC has helped thousands of California families protect their assets and plan for the future.
📞 Call us today:
- Main Office: 866-400-0058
- Direct: 916-963-9968
About the Author: Dustin MacFarlane, Esq.
California Licensed Attorney | Estate Planning Specialist
Dustin MacFarlane is the founder of California Probate and Trust, PC, with over 15 years of experience in estate planning, probate administration, and trust law. Licensed by the California State Bar, Dustin has helped thousands of California families protect their assets and plan for the future.
CA Bar License: Active | Practice Areas: Estate Planning, Probate, Trust Administration | Location: Granite Bay, CA