Schedule a Free Consultation

Author: CPT Team

Categories
Estate Planning California Probate Trusts

Understanding Godoy v. Linzner: What California Families Need to Know About Property Transfer Restrictions in Trust

Generated Image January 14 2026 6 23PM

If you’re a California resident creating or managing a trust that includes real estate—especially a family home—you need to understand how state law protects your heirs’ property rights. A recent California case, Godoy v. Linzner, clarifies an important rule: you cannot place unreasonable restrictions on your beneficiaries’ ability to sell or transfer inherited property.

Who This Affects

This ruling matters if you are:

  • Creating a trust that includes California real estate
  • Inheriting property through a trust and facing restrictions on selling your share
  • Managing family property where multiple siblings or heirs have ownership interests
  • Concerned about protecting your heirs’ flexibility while still preserving family assets

    • What the Court Decided

    The California court applied Civil Code section 711, which prohibits unreasonable restraints on alienation, to property transferred through trusts and wills. In simpler terms: California law protects your right to sell or transfer property you inherit, even if the person who created the trust tried to limit that right.

    In this case, three children each inherited a one-third ownership interest in their family home after their parent died. The trust attempted to restrict what the children could do with their shares, but the court found these restrictions violated California law.

    What Does “Unreasonable Restraint on Alienation” Mean?

    Alienation simply means transferring or selling property. An unreasonable restraint is any rule that makes it too difficult for an owner to sell, gift, or otherwise transfer their property interest. While some temporary or limited restrictions may be acceptable, California strongly favors property owners’ freedom to control their own assets.

    Real-World Implications for Your Estate Plan

    If you’re creating a trust:

  • You cannot indefinitely prevent your beneficiaries from selling inherited real estate
  • Restrictions that seem protective may actually be unenforceable and create family conflict
  • Work with an experienced California estate planning attorney to structure provisions that balance your goals with legal requirements

    • If you’ve inherited property with restrictions:

  • You may have more rights than you realize to sell or transfer your share
  • Unreasonable restrictions in the trust document may not be legally binding
  • Consult with a probate attorney who understands California property law before accepting limitations on your ownership rights

    • How to Protect Family Property Without Violating California Law

    Many families want to keep a cherished home in the family for generations. Rather than imposing rigid restrictions that courts may strike down, consider these alternatives:

  • Right of first refusal: Give other family members the opportunity to purchase a share before it’s sold to outsiders
  • Limited liability companies (LLCs): Transfer property into an LLC with operating agreements that provide structure while respecting ownership rights
  • Life estate arrangements: Allow one person to live in the property during their lifetime while others hold future interests
  • Clear communication: Discuss your intentions with heirs so they understand your values without legal compulsion

    • Why California Residents Need Specialized Estate Planning Guidance

    California has specific laws governing trusts, probate, and property transfers that differ from other states. What works in another jurisdiction may create legal problems here. The Godoy v. Linzner case demonstrates why generic estate planning documents or online templates may not adequately protect your family’s interests.

    At California Probate and Trust, PC, we help California families navigate complex property and trust issues. Our experienced estate planning attorneys understand how to structure trusts that honor your wishes while complying with California law. We’ve assisted thousands of clients in Sacramento, Fair Oaks, and San Francisco with creating comprehensive estate plans that protect both current and future generations.

    Take Action to Protect Your Family’s Property Rights

    Whether you’re creating an estate plan or dealing with property you’ve inherited, professional guidance ensures your rights are protected and your intentions are legally sound.

    Schedule a free consultation with California Probate and Trust, PC today. Our compassionate attorneys will review your situation, explain your options in plain language, and develop a strategy tailored to your family’s needs. We offer transparent pricing and prioritize building lasting relationships with California residents who value clarity and family protection.

    Contact us now to discuss your estate planning or property inheritance questions.

    Source: California Lawyers Association – Godoy v. Linzner

    Categories
    Estate Planning California Probate Trusts

    Who Has Legal Standing to File a Conservatorship in California? Understanding the Conservatorship of Anne S. Ruling

    Generated Image January 14 2026 6 19PM 1

    If you’re a California resident concerned about protecting a vulnerable loved one—or worried about who might have the authority to intervene in your own affairs—understanding who can legally file for conservatorship is critical. A recent California appellate court decision clarifies an important limitation: simply being someone’s neighbor does not give you the legal right to petition for conservatorship.

    What This Case Means for California Families

    In Conservatorship of Anne S., the court ruled that merely being a proposed conservatee’s neighbor is insufficient to qualify as an “interested person” or friend with standing to file a petition for conservatorship.

    This ruling matters because it protects California residents from unwarranted legal interventions while still allowing genuine family members, healthcare providers, and other qualified individuals to seek conservatorship when truly necessary.

    Who Can File for Conservatorship in California?

    California law limits who may petition for conservatorship to protect the rights and dignity of proposed conservatees. Generally, the following individuals have legal standing:

    • The proposed conservatee themselves
    • Spouse or domestic partner
    • Relatives (parents, siblings, children, and other family members)
    • Friends who have a meaningful, established relationship with the proposed conservatee
    • Creditors in specific circumstances
    • Any person or entity otherwise interested in the proposed conservatee’s welfare—but this requires demonstrating a genuine connection beyond mere proximity

    The Anne S. case reinforces that physical proximity alone—such as living next door—does not establish the kind of meaningful relationship required to be considered an “interested person” under California Probate Code.

    Real-World Implications: When Should You Be Concerned?

    This ruling is particularly relevant if:

    • You’re caring for an aging parent and want to understand who might legally challenge your authority or seek conservatorship
    • You’re concerned about a vulnerable family member and need to know whether you have standing to petition for protection
    • You want to establish clear legal protections now to prevent unwanted interventions later
    • You’re involved in estate planning and want to ensure the right people have authority to make decisions on your behalf if needed

    How to Protect Your Family’s Legal Rights

    The best way to avoid conservatorship disputes is proactive estate planning. California residents can:

    • Establish a durable power of attorney to designate who can make financial decisions if you become incapacitated
    • Create an advance healthcare directive to name trusted individuals for medical decisions
    • Set up a revocable living trust to manage assets and avoid probate while maintaining control during your lifetime
    • Document your wishes clearly to minimize family conflicts and legal challenges

    These tools give you control over who has authority in your life, rather than leaving those decisions to the courts.

    Why This Matters for California Estate Planning

    Cases like Conservatorship of Anne S. highlight the complexity of California conservatorship law and the importance of having experienced legal guidance. Understanding who has standing to petition for conservatorship—and who doesn’t—helps families make informed decisions about protecting their loved ones while respecting individual autonomy.

    Need Help with Conservatorship or Estate Planning in California?

    If you’re facing conservatorship questions or want to establish legal protections for yourself or your family, California Probate and Trust, PC provides compassionate, transparent guidance tailored to California residents managing complex family dynamics and estate planning needs.

    Our experienced team helps families navigate conservatorship proceedings, create comprehensive estate plans, and establish the legal safeguards needed to protect what matters most—your family and your legacy.

    Schedule your free consultation today to discuss your specific situation and learn how we can help you gain confidence and control over your future.

    Source: California Lawyers Association – Conservatorship of Anne S.

    Categories
    Estate Planning California Probate Trusts

    When Can You File a Demurrer in a California Probate Case? Understanding Goebner v. Superior Court

    Generated Image January 14 2026 6 14PM

    f you’re navigating probate litigation in California or managing a contested estate, understanding procedural timelines can protect your rights and prevent costly mistakes. A recent California case, Goebner v. Superior Court, clarifies an important rule: a demurrer may be filed at any time at or before the initial hearing in a probate case.

    This ruling matters for California residents dealing with probate disputes, estate challenges, or trust litigation—situations where timing and legal precision are everything.

    What Is a Demurrer in Probate?

    A demurrer is a legal tool used to challenge the sufficiency of a petition or complaint. In probate cases, this means you can object to a petition on the grounds that it fails to state a valid legal claim—even if all the facts alleged are true.

    Common scenarios where a demurrer might be filed include:

    • Challenging the validity of a will or trust
    • Contesting the appointment of a personal representative or trustee
    • Disputing claims against an estate
    • Objecting to petitions for distribution of assets

    Why the Goebner Ruling Matters for California Residents

    The decision in Goebner v. Superior Court provides clarity on procedural flexibility. Unlike some civil litigation deadlines that are strict and unforgiving, probate law allows parties to raise fundamental legal objections up until the initial hearing. This gives families and beneficiaries more breathing room to consult with legal counsel and assess their options.

    For those managing California-based estates or trusts, this means:

    • You have time to review probate petitions carefully before the first court appearance
    • You can raise substantive legal challenges without missing narrow filing windows
    • You’re protected from procedural pitfalls if you act before the initial hearing

    Real-World Application: Protecting Your Family’s Interests

    Imagine you’re a beneficiary who receives notice of a probate petition that appears legally deficient—perhaps it omits required allegations or violates probate code provisions. Under Goebner, you can file a demurrer at or before the initial hearing to challenge the petition’s legal sufficiency.

    This flexibility is especially valuable for families dealing with:

    • Complex estate disputes involving multiple heirs
    • Challenges to the validity of estate planning documents
    • Contested guardianship or conservatorship matters
    • Trust administration conflicts

    How California Probate and Trust, PC Can Help

    Navigating probate litigation requires both technical knowledge of California probate law and strategic timing. Whether you’re facing a contested probate matter now or want to create an estate plan that minimizes future disputes, working with experienced legal counsel makes all the difference.

    At California Probate and Trust, PC, we provide comprehensive guidance for California residents managing probate cases, estate planning, and trust administration. Our approach combines legal expertise with transparent communication—so you understand your options and feel confident in every decision.

    If you’re dealing with a probate challenge or need guidance on demurrers and court procedures, contact us today for a consultation. Protect your family’s interests with knowledgeable, responsive legal support.

    Source: California Lawyers Association – Goebner v. Superior Court

    Categories
    Estate Planning California Probate Trusts

    Packard v. Packard: What California Families Need to Know About Trust Reformation vs. Trust Contests

    Generated Image January 14 2026 6 12PM

    If you’re managing a California trust and discover what appears to be a drafting error or misunderstanding of the trustor’s true intentions, you may be wondering: “Can I fix this mistake without triggering a costly trust contest?” The recent Packard v. Packard case provides critical clarity for California residents navigating trust administration and reformation.

    What Happened in Packard v. Packard?

    In this case, beneficiaries filed a petition seeking construction and reformation of a trust amendment. They believed the trust document contained a mistake that didn’t accurately reflect what the trustor actually intended. The central legal question was whether this type of petition constituted a “trust contest”—a distinction that carries significant procedural and financial implications.

    The court ruled that a petition for construction and reformation of a trust amendment is not a contest when it seeks to correct an alleged mistake regarding the trustor’s intent.

    Why This Matters for Your California Trust

    This ruling is important for California families because:

    • Trust contests trigger different rules: Contest proceedings come with specific statutory requirements, shortened timelines, and potentially higher litigation costs
    • Reformation protects family harmony: When you can seek reformation instead of filing a contest, you may be able to resolve disputes more collaboratively and cost-effectively
    • Trustor intent is paramount: California courts prioritize what the trustor actually wanted over technical drafting errors

    Real-World Application: When You Might Need Trust Reformation

    Consider these common scenarios where Packard v. Packard could apply to your situation:

    • Your parent’s trust amendment appears to contradict their clearly stated wishes expressed to family members
    • A scrivener’s error in the trust document resulted in unintended beneficiary designations
    • Tax planning language in the trust doesn’t align with the professional advice your trustor received
    • Asset distribution percentages don’t match the trustor’s documented intentions in correspondence or other estate planning documents

    In these situations, you may be able to petition for reformation without the procedural burdens of a formal trust contest.

    How California Probate and Trust Can Help

    At California Probate and Trust, PC, we understand that discovering potential errors in a trust document creates anxiety and uncertainty. Our Sacramento-based team has represented thousands of California families through complex trust administration and reformation matters.

    We offer a free one-hour consultation where we’ll:

    • Review your trust documents and the specific issue you’ve identified
    • Explain whether reformation or another legal remedy is appropriate for your situation
    • Outline the procedural steps and realistic timeline
    • Provide transparent pricing so you can make informed decisions

    Our approach prioritizes family protection and clarity throughout the legal process. We know that trust disputes often arise during already difficult times, and we’re committed to resolving issues efficiently while honoring your loved one’s true intentions.

    Take Action Today

    If you’re dealing with a trust that may not reflect the trustor’s actual intent, don’t wait. Early legal guidance can prevent costly litigation and protect family relationships.

    Schedule your free consultation with our experienced Sacramento trust attorneys today, or call us at (866) 674-1130.

    Source: California Lawyers Association – Packard v. Packard

    Categories
    Estate Planning California Probate Trusts

    Can a Child Inherit From a Parent’s Estate If They Were Unintentionally Omitted From the Will?

    Generated Image January 14 2026 6 09PM

    To inherit a share of a parent’s estate as an omitted child, the child must show that the sole reason for omission was that the testator was unaware of the child’s birth.

    Source: California Lawyers Association – Estate of Williams

    Can a Child Inherit From a Parent’s Estate If They Were Unintentionally Omitted From the Will?

    If you’re managing a California estate or worried that a child may have been left out of a will unintentionally, understanding the legal rights of omitted children is critical. Under California probate law, a child who can prove they were excluded solely because the parent (testator) did not know about their birth may be entitled to inherit a share of the estate.

    This article explains what the Estate of Williams case means for California families, how omitted child claims work, and what steps you should take to protect your loved ones.

    Who Is This Article For?

    This guide is for:

    • Adult children who believe they were unintentionally left out of a parent’s estate plan
    • Parents and blended families concerned about ensuring all children are accounted for in estate documents
    • Executors and trustees navigating probate when questions arise about omitted heirs
    • California residents seeking clarity on probate rights and estate planning protections

    What Does “Omitted Child” Mean in California Probate Law?

    An omitted child is a child who was not included in a parent’s will or trust, either intentionally or unintentionally. California Probate Code sections provide legal protections for children who were left out due to oversight—especially when the parent was unaware of the child’s existence at the time the estate plan was created.

    According to the ruling in Estate of Williams, to successfully claim a share of the estate, the omitted child must demonstrate that the sole reason for their exclusion was that the testator did not know about their birth.

    How Can an Omitted Child Prove Their Case?

    To inherit under California law as an omitted child, you must show:

    • The testator (parent) created a will or trust
    • You were born before or after the will was executed
    • You were not mentioned or provided for in the will
    • The reason you were omitted was solely because the testator was unaware of your birth

    This is a fact-intensive determination. Courts will review:

    • Timing of the will’s creation and the child’s birth
    • Communication records or acknowledgment of paternity/maternity
    • Whether the testator later learned of the child and chose not to update the estate plan

    Real-World Example: When Does This Apply?

    Imagine a father creates a will in 2010, naming his two known children as beneficiaries. In 2015, he learns he has a third child from a previous relationship but passes away in 2018 without updating his will. The third child may have a claim—but only if they can prove the father had no knowledge of their existence when the will was originally drafted in 2010.

    If the father knew about the child in 2015 and still chose not to update his will, the child may not qualify as “omitted” under the statute.

    What Happens If You Qualify as an Omitted Child?

    If the court finds in favor of the omitted child, they will typically receive:

    • A share of the estate equivalent to what they would have inherited under California’s intestacy laws (if the parent had died without a will)
    • This share comes from the estate’s residual assets and may reduce distributions to other named beneficiaries

    How to Prevent Omitted Child Issues in Your Estate Plan

    If you’re creating or updating your estate plan in California, here’s how to avoid unintentional omissions:

    • Name all your children explicitly in your will or trust, even if you choose to leave them unequal shares or disinherit them intentionally (with clear language)
    • Include an “all-children” clause that accounts for any children born or adopted after the document is signed
    • Update your plan after major life events such as marriage, divorce, remarriage, or the birth of a child
    • Work with an experienced California estate planning attorney who understands omitted heir statutes and can help you draft language that protects your intentions

    Why Work With California Probate and Trust, PC?

    At California Probate and Trust, PC, we help California families navigate the complexities of estate planning and probate with transparency and care. Whether you’re concerned about protecting all your heirs or you’re facing a probate dispute as an omitted child, our experienced attorneys provide:

    • Free consultations to assess your situation and goals
    • Clear, compassionate guidance through probate and trust administration
    • Customized estate plans that prevent future family conflict
    • Representation in probate litigation when disputes arise

    We’ve helped thousands of clients across Sacramento, Fair Oaks, and San Francisco protect their families and legacies. Our mission is to give you confidence and control over your future.

    Take Action Today

    If you’re dealing with an omitted child situation—either as a parent planning your estate or as a child seeking your rightful inheritance—don’t wait. California probate law has strict deadlines, and early action can make all the difference.

    Schedule your free consultation with California Probate and Trust, PC today. Call (866) 674-1130 or visit cpt.law to get started.

    Source: California Lawyers Association – Estate of Williams

    Categories
    Estate Planning California Probate Trusts

    Can Heirs Who Aren’t Named in a Trust Still Challenge It? What California Families Need to Know About Hamlin v. Jendayi

    Generated Image January 14 2026 6 01PM

    If you’re a California resident managing an estate or worried about protecting your family’s inheritance rights, a recent legal development could significantly impact your ability to contest a trust—even if you were never named as a beneficiary.

    The Legal Question: Who Has Standing to Contest a Trust in California?

    In Hamlin v. Jendayi, California courts clarified an important principle: intestate heirs have standing to contest a trust even if they were never named as trust beneficiaries.

    What does this mean for you?

    • Intestate heirs are individuals who would inherit from someone who died without a will under California’s intestate succession laws—typically children, spouses, parents, or siblings.
    • Standing means you have the legal right to bring a lawsuit or challenge the validity of a trust in court.
    • Even if a trust document doesn’t name you as a beneficiary, you may still have the right to contest it if you would have inherited assets had the trust not existed.

    Why This Matters for California Families

    This ruling protects family members who may have been excluded from a trust due to:

    • Undue influence or coercion by another party
    • Lack of mental capacity when the trust was created
    • Fraud or forgery
    • Failure to follow proper legal procedures

    Without this legal standing, rightful heirs could be shut out of challenging suspicious or invalid trusts, leaving them with no recourse even when something appears wrong.

    Real-World Scenario: When You Might Need to Contest a Trust

    Imagine this situation: Your aging parent created a trust years ago naming you and your siblings as beneficiaries. Later, a new caregiver enters the picture, and suddenly a new trust is drafted that removes all family members and names only the caregiver. Under Hamlin v. Jendayi, you have standing to challenge that trust—even though you’re not named in the new version—because you’re an intestate heir who would inherit if the trust were invalid.

    How California Probate and Trust, PC Can Help

    Navigating trust contests and probate disputes requires deep knowledge of California estate law and a compassionate approach to family dynamics. At California Probate and Trust, PC, our certified estate planning specialists help California residents:

    • Understand their legal rights as heirs and beneficiaries
    • Evaluate whether grounds exist to challenge a trust
    • Navigate complex probate and trust litigation
    • Protect family legacies with transparent, comprehensive estate plans

    We’ve represented thousands of clients across Sacramento, Fair Oaks, and San Francisco, providing the one-stop-shop legal and financial guidance that families need during uncertain times.

    Take Action: Protect Your Inheritance Rights

    If you’re concerned about your rights as an heir or need to contest a trust in California, don’t wait. The attorneys at California Probate and Trust, PC offer free consultations to assess your situation and outline your options.

    Schedule your free consultation today: Call (866) 674-1130 or visit cpt.law to protect what matters most—your family and your legacy.

    Source: California Lawyers Association – Hamlin v. Jendayi

    Categories
    Estate Planning California Probate Trusts

    Connelly v. United States: What California Business Owners Need to Know About Share Redemption Agreements and Estate Tax Valuation

    Generated Image January 14 2026 5 58PM

    If you’re a California business owner with a buy-sell agreement in place, or if you’re managing the estate of someone who owned shares in a closely held corporation, a recent Supreme Court decision could significantly impact how the IRS values those shares for federal estate tax purposes.

    What Is Connelly v. United States?

    In Connelly v. United States, the Supreme Court clarified a critical issue: A corporation’s contractual obligation to redeem shares does not automatically reduce the corporation’s value for federal estate tax purposes.

    This ruling is particularly important for families and business owners in California who use life insurance-funded buy-sell agreements to ensure smooth ownership transitions when a shareholder passes away.

    Who Does This Affect?

    This decision is relevant if you:

    • Own shares in a closely held or family-owned business
    • Have a buy-sell agreement that requires the corporation to purchase a deceased owner’s shares
    • Are an executor or trustee handling an estate that includes business ownership interests
    • Are planning your estate and want to minimize tax exposure for your heirs

    Why Does This Matter for Estate Planning?

    Many business owners assume that because the company is obligated to buy back shares upon an owner’s death, that obligation reduces the company’s net value—and therefore reduces the taxable estate. Connelly says otherwise.

    The Court held that the redemption obligation is not treated as a liability that offsets the value of the corporation. As a result, the IRS may value the decedent’s shares higher than expected, leading to a larger estate tax bill.

    Real-World Example

    Imagine two siblings co-own a California-based manufacturing business. They have a buy-sell agreement funded by life insurance. When one sibling dies, the corporation uses the insurance proceeds to buy out the deceased sibling’s shares.

    Before Connelly, some estate planners argued the buyout obligation reduced the company’s value. Now, the IRS can argue the full value of the shares—plus the insurance proceeds—should be included in the estate, potentially triggering unexpected estate taxes.

    How Can You Protect Your Family and Your Business?

    If you’re a California resident with business interests, here’s what you should consider:

    • Review your buy-sell agreements. Work with an experienced estate planning attorney to assess whether your current agreement exposes your estate to higher taxes.
    • Explore alternative structures. Cross-purchase agreements (where individual owners buy each other’s shares) may provide different tax outcomes than entity-redemption agreements.
    • Update your estate plan. Make sure your will, trust, and financial plans account for the true tax impact of your business ownership.
    • Consult with professionals who understand California law. Estate and business succession planning requires coordination between legal, tax, and financial advisors.

    How California Probate and Trust, PC Can Help

    At California Probate and Trust, PC, we specialize in helping California families navigate complex estate planning challenges—including business succession, trust administration, and probate. We understand that planning for the future of your business isn’t just about taxes; it’s about protecting the people and legacy you care about most.

    Whether you’re a business owner concerned about estate taxes, an executor managing a complex estate, or a family member trying to understand your options, we offer transparent guidance tailored to your situation.

    Take the Next Step

    Don’t let a Supreme Court ruling catch you or your family off guard. Schedule a free consultation with our experienced estate planning attorneys to review your buy-sell agreements, update your estate plan, and ensure your business and family are protected.

    📞 Call us today at (866) 674-1130 or schedule your free consultation online.

    Source: California Lawyers Association – Connelly v. United States

    Categories
    California Probate Long Term Care Planning Trusts

    Conservatorship of A.J.: What California Families Need to Know About LPS Conservatorships and Least Restrictive Placement

    Generated Image January 14 2026 5 55PM

    If you’re a California resident managing the care of a loved one with severe mental health challenges, understanding the legal boundaries of LPS conservatorships is critical. A recent ruling in Conservatorship of A.J. highlights a significant issue: courts cannot delegate the responsibility to determine the least restrictive placement to the Public Guardian.

    Who This Applies To

    This case matters if you are:

    • A family member seeking conservatorship for someone with mental illness
    • An advocate questioning whether a conservatee is in the most appropriate facility
    • A California resident navigating LPS (Lanterman-Petris-Short Act) conservatorship proceedings
    • Anyone concerned about protecting the rights and dignity of vulnerable adults

    What Happened in Conservatorship of A.J.?

    In this case, the court issued an order appointing the Public Guardian as the LPS conservator and gave the Public Guardian authority to place the conservatee in a psychiatric facility, nursing home, or other state-licensed facility.

    The problem? The court improperly delegated to the Public Guardian the duty to designate the least restrictive alternative placement. Under California law, it is the court’s responsibility—not the conservator’s—to make this determination.

    Why the “Least Restrictive Alternative” Matters

    California law requires that individuals under conservatorship be placed in the least restrictive environment that meets their needs. This principle protects personal freedom while ensuring safety and appropriate care.

    When courts improperly hand off this duty, it can result in:

    • Conservatees being placed in overly restrictive settings
    • Lack of judicial oversight on critical placement decisions
    • Violations of the conservatee’s civil liberties

    How Can Families Protect Their Loved Ones?

    If you or a family member is involved in an LPS conservatorship case, consider these steps:

    • Request judicial review of placement decisions. Ensure the court is actively involved in determining the least restrictive setting.
    • Understand your rights under the LPS Act. California law provides strong protections for conservatees, including regular hearings and access to legal counsel.
    • Work with experienced legal counsel. Conservatorship cases involve complex mental health and legal standards. An attorney who understands both probate and mental health law can make a significant difference.

    What This Means for Estate Planning and Long-Term Care

    While Conservatorship of A.J. specifically addresses LPS conservatorships, it underscores a broader truth: California families need proactive legal planning to protect vulnerable loved ones. Whether you’re dealing with mental health crises, elder care, or incapacity planning, having the right legal framework in place is essential.

    At California Probate and Trust, PC, we help families navigate conservatorships, probate, and estate planning with transparency and compassion. Our team understands the emotional and legal complexity of these situations and provides personalized guidance to protect both your loved ones and your peace of mind.

    Get Legal Guidance You Can Trust

    If you’re facing conservatorship issues or want to plan ahead to avoid court intervention in the future, we’re here to help. Schedule a free consultation with our experienced Sacramento-based attorneys to discuss your family’s unique needs and create a plan that protects everyone involved.

    Source: California Lawyers Association – Conservatorship of A.J.

    Ready to take the next step? Contact California Probate and Trust, PC today for your free estate planning consultation.

    Categories
    Estate Planning California Probate Trusts

    Can a Named Executor Be Denied Appointment for Mismanagement? What California Residents Need to Know About Estate of Bodmann

    Generated Image January 14 2026 5 42PM

    If you’ve been named as an executor in a loved one’s will, you might assume the appointment is automatic. A recent California case—Estate of Bodmann (Krouse v. Holden-Bodmann)—proves otherwise. This ruling clarifies that mishandling estate assets before you’re officially appointed can disqualify you from serving as executor entirely.

    Source: California Lawyers Association – Estate of Bodmann

    What Does This Case Mean for California Executors?

    Under California Probate Code sections 8402(a)(3) and 8502(a), the court can deny appointment to a named executor who has mismanaged estate assets—even if that mismanagement happened before formal appointment.

    Key takeaway: “Mismanagement” includes any conduct that badly, improperly, or unskillfully handles estate property. This ruling protects beneficiaries from executors who demonstrate poor judgment or financial mishandling early in the process.

    Who Should Care About This Ruling?

    This case matters most to:

    • California residents who have been named as executors in a family member’s will
    • Beneficiaries concerned about an executor’s handling of estate assets
    • Estate planning clients who want to choose the right executor and protect their legacy
    • Families navigating probate who need clarity on executor accountability

    Real-World Questions This Case Answers

    Can an executor be removed before they’re officially appointed?

    Yes. If a named executor mishanages estate property before appointment, the probate court can deny their appointment entirely under sections 8402(a)(3) and 8502(a).

    What counts as “mismanagement” of estate assets?

    Mismanagement includes handling estate property badly, improperly, or without skill—such as selling assets below market value, failing to secure property, or commingling estate funds with personal accounts.

    How can beneficiaries protect themselves?

    If you suspect pre-appointment mismanagement, you can petition the court to deny the executor’s appointment. Working with an experienced California probate attorney ensures your concerns are properly documented and presented.

    Why Proper Estate Planning Prevents These Problems

    The best way to avoid executor disputes is through thoughtful estate planning before a crisis occurs. When you work with a firm that understands both California probate law and family dynamics, you can:

    • Choose an executor who has the skills and temperament to manage your estate responsibly
    • Build in safeguards like co-executors or trust protectors
    • Create clear instructions that reduce the risk of mismanagement
    • Protect your beneficiaries from costly probate disputes

    California Probate and Trust, PC helps families navigate these exact scenarios. With offices in Fair Oaks, Sacramento, and San Francisco, our certified estate planning specialists have guided thousands of California residents through probate challenges and proactive estate planning.

    What Should You Do If You’re Facing an Executor Issue?

    Whether you’re a beneficiary concerned about mismanagement or a named executor who wants to fulfill your duties properly, getting legal guidance early is critical. The Estate of Bodmann case shows that California courts take executor accountability seriously—and early action can prevent costly mistakes.

    Protect Your Family’s Future with Expert Estate Planning

    Don’t leave your legacy to chance. If you’re a California resident concerned about executor selection, probate disputes, or protecting your estate, California Probate and Trust, PC offers a free one-hour consultation to review your situation and explore your options.

    Schedule your free consultation today:

    Our compassionate team provides transparent guidance for California families who value protection, clarity, and peace of mind. Whether you’re planning ahead or navigating probate now, we’re here to help you every step of the way.

    Categories
    Estate Planning California Probate Trusts

    Newell v. Superior Court: What California Trustees and Property Owners Need to Know About Trust Disputes and Real Property Claims

    Generated Image January 14 2026 5 38PM

    Petition seeking a change in trustee of a trust that holds real property constitutes a real property claim within the meaning of Code of Civil Procedure section 405.4.

    Source: California Lawyers Association – Newell v. Superior Court

    Newell v. Superior Court: What California Trustees and Property Owners Need to Know About Trust Disputes and Real Property Claims

    If you’re managing a trust that holds California real estate—or if you’re involved in a dispute over trust administration—a recent California case clarifies an important procedural issue: when does a petition to change a trustee qualify as a “real property claim”?

    The California Court of Appeal addressed this question in Newell v. Superior Court, holding that a petition seeking to remove and replace a trustee of a trust holding real property constitutes a real property claim under California Code of Civil Procedure section 405.4.

    Why This Matters for California Residents and Trustees

    This ruling has significant implications for anyone involved in trust administration or estate disputes in California, particularly when real estate is part of the trust assets. Understanding how courts classify these claims can affect:

    • The legal procedures required to bring or defend against trustee removal actions
    • The strategic options available to beneficiaries and trustees in disputes
    • The potential for clouding title to real property held in trust
    • The urgency and complexity of resolving trust disputes involving California real estate

    What Is a Real Property Claim Under California Law?

    Code of Civil Procedure section 405.4 allows parties to record a notice of pending action (lis pendens) when litigation involves a real property claim. A lis pendens serves as public notice that the property’s title or right to possession is in dispute, which can prevent the property from being sold or transferred during litigation.

    Before Newell v. Superior Court, it wasn’t always clear whether disputes focused on trustee conduct—rather than direct challenges to property ownership—would qualify as real property claims. This case clarifies that when a trust holds real estate and a petition seeks to change the trustee, the claim impacts the real property interest and may be treated accordingly under section 405.4.

    Real-World Impact: When Might This Apply to You?

    Consider these common scenarios where the Newell decision could matter:

    • Family trust disputes: Siblings disagree over how a parent’s trust is being managed, and the trust holds the family home or investment properties in California.
    • Suspected trustee misconduct: Beneficiaries believe the trustee is mismanaging trust assets, including real estate, and seek court intervention to replace the trustee.
    • Real estate transactions on hold: A pending petition to remove a trustee may cloud title, delaying or preventing the sale of trust-owned property.
    • Probate and trust administration: Executors and trustees navigating California probate need to understand procedural requirements that protect beneficiaries and property interests.

    How California Probate and Trust, PC Can Help

    At California Probate and Trust, PC, we understand that trust disputes and probate matters can feel overwhelming—especially when your family’s real estate is involved. Whether you’re a trustee facing a removal petition, a beneficiary concerned about trust administration, or an estate planning client looking to prevent future conflicts, our experienced Sacramento-based attorneys provide transparent, compassionate guidance tailored to California residents.

    We’ve helped thousands of clients across California navigate complex trust and probate issues, including:

    • Trust administration and trustee representation
    • Beneficiary rights and trust dispute resolution
    • Estate planning strategies to protect real property
    • Probate litigation and real property claims
    • Revocable and irrevocable trusts designed to avoid future disputes

    Take Control of Your Trust and Estate Planning Today

    Don’t wait until a dispute arises to protect your family’s assets and legacy. If you’re managing a trust with California real estate, involved in a trustee dispute, or simply want to ensure your estate plan is legally sound, we’re here to help.

    Schedule your FREE consultation with California Probate and Trust, PC today. Our team will walk you through your options, explain your rights, and develop a personalized plan that protects what matters most.

    Contact us now to get started.

    Source: California Lawyers Association – Newell v. Superior Court